PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPD vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPD vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPD achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than FDIS's -0.65% return.


GXPD

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
-0.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDIS

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
-0.87%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
13.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPD vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPD and FDIS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPD vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPD

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPD vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXPD vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXPDFDISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.61

-0.34

Drawdowns

GXPD vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPD drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum FDIS drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPD and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPDFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.61%

-39.16%

+22.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.48%

-5.22%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-7.50%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

Volatility

GXPD vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPDFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.01%

18.37%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.01%

23.87%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.01%

22.29%

-2.28%

GXPD vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXPD vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

GXPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than FDIS's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
GXPD
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, GXPD and FDIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPD.

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.

GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPD and 0.08% for FDIS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPD and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer