GXPD vs. BEDZ
GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) and BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. GXPD is passively managed, while BEDZ is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEDZ.
Performance
GXPD vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPD achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than BEDZ's 8.61% return.
GXPD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- -5.17%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEDZ
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 10.22%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPD vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -0.65% | 5.36% |
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 8.61% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPD and BEDZ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPD vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank
GXPD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BEDZ
GXPD vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPD | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPD vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPD drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum BEDZ drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPD and BEDZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPD | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -29.70% | +13.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -4.09% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -7.95% | +3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility
GXPD vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPD | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 20.40% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 24.78% | -4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 24.72% | -4.29% |
GXPD vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPD vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison
GXPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than BEDZ's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 2.13% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 0.21% | 0.36% |
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.34% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPD and BEDZ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.
BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.34% for GXPD.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPD and 0.99% for BEDZ.
Find the right allocation for GXPD and BEDZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer