PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVUS vs. GVIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVUS vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly higher than GVIP's 8.45% return.


GVUS

1D
0.40%
1M
1.97%
6M
15.29%
YTD
20.44%
1Y
32.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.48%

GVIP

1D
-0.64%
1M
-6.63%
6M
5.72%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
21.61%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.23M$1.88M$2.26M
$3.81M$1.84M$668.69K

GVUS vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
20.44%15.90%14.08%5.51%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
8.45%25.27%29.82%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GVUS and GVIP is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.63

The correlation between GVUS and GVIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

GVUS vs. GVIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVUS
GVIP

Technology

19.6%
37.9%

Financial Services

19.3%
15.5%

Healthcare

12.6%
8.6%

Industrials

10.3%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
1.2%

Energy

6.1%

-

Utilities

3.9%
5.9%

Real Estate

3.8%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%

-

Communication Services

3.2%
11.7%

Technology

GVUS
19.6%
GVIP
37.9%

Financial Services

GVUS
19.3%
GVIP
15.5%

Healthcare

GVUS
12.6%
GVIP
8.6%

Industrials

GVUS
10.3%
GVIP
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GVUS
10.2%
GVIP
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

GVUS
7.3%
GVIP
1.2%

Energy

GVUS
6.1%
GVIP

-

Utilities

GVUS
3.9%
GVIP
5.9%

Real Estate

GVUS
3.8%
GVIP

-

Basic Materials

GVUS
3.5%
GVIP

-

Communication Services

GVUS
3.2%
GVIP
11.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVUS vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GVUS
GVUS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GVIP
GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GVUS vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVUSGVIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.16

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

1.20

+3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.95

4.60

+15.35

GVUS vs. GVIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the GVIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVUS and GVIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVUS vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and GVIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVUSGVIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-37.09%

+21.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

-16.36%

+9.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-12.39%

+12.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-7.57%

+5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

4.26%

-2.70%

Volatility

GVUS vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) is 2.93%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that GVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVUSGVIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

9.71%

-6.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

20.33%

-11.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

23.29%

-11.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

22.24%

-9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

22.02%

-8.81%

GVUS vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVUS vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison

GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than GVIP's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
0.31%0.34%0.29%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.12%0.77%0.44%0.45%0.08%
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
1.49%1.77%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVUS and GVIP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVIP has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to GVUS (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs GVIP's -37.09%.

On 1-year performance, GVUS leads with 32.63% vs 21.61% for GVIP. On fees, GVUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GVUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GVUS has performed better with a 32.63% return vs 21.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GVUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.

GVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.31% for GVIP.

GVUS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GVIP is Large Cap Growth Equities. GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.45% for GVIP.

GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVUS and GVIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer