PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVUS vs. GVIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVUS vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's 16.17% return.


GVUS

1D
0.03%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.24%
6M
14.89%
1Y
28.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GVIP

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.71%
YTD
16.17%
6M
18.08%
1Y
36.94%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVUS vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
14.24%15.90%14.08%5.51%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
16.17%25.27%29.82%3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GVUS and GVIP is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023

0.66

The correlation between GVUS and GVIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

GVUS vs. GVIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVUS
GVIP

Financial Services

19.2%
15.8%

Technology

15.0%
38.6%

Industrials

13.1%
9.5%

Healthcare

10.8%
8.0%

Communication Services

8.5%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
1.2%

Energy

6.9%

-

Utilities

4.3%
8.4%

Real Estate

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

3.8%

-

Financial Services

GVUS
19.2%
GVIP
15.8%

Technology

GVUS
15.0%
GVIP
38.6%

Industrials

GVUS
13.1%
GVIP
9.5%

Healthcare

GVUS
10.8%
GVIP
8.0%

Communication Services

GVUS
8.5%
GVIP
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GVUS
7.3%
GVIP
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

GVUS
7.1%
GVIP
1.2%

Energy

GVUS
6.9%
GVIP

-

Utilities

GVUS
4.3%
GVIP
8.4%

Real Estate

GVUS
4.0%
GVIP

-

Basic Materials

GVUS
3.8%
GVIP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVUS vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVUS
GVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GVIP
GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVUS vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GVUSGVIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.36

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

2.71

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.70

11.81

+5.89

GVUS vs. GVIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the GVIP Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVUS and GVIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GVUSGVIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.05

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

0.82

+0.73

Drawdowns

GVUS vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and GVIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVUSGVIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-37.09%

+21.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

-13.67%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-7.59%

+5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

3.14%

-1.54%

Volatility

GVUS vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) is 3.01%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that GVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVUSGVIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

5.42%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

14.47%

-6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.86%

18.13%

-7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.28%

21.29%

-8.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.28%

21.65%

-8.37%

GVUS vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVUS vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison

GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than GVIP's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
0.29%0.34%0.29%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.12%0.77%0.44%0.45%0.08%
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
1.58%1.77%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVUS and GVIP have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVIP has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to GVUS (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs GVIP's -37.09%.

On 1-year performance, GVIP leads with 36.94% vs 28.22% for GVUS. On fees, GVUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GVUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GVIP has performed better with a 36.94% return vs 28.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GVUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.

GVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.

GVUS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GVIP is Large Cap Growth Equities. GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.45% for GVIP.

GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVUS and GVIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer