GVUS vs. GVIP
GVUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF) and GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVUS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GVIP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GVUS returned 28.22% vs 36.94% for GVIP. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GVUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GVIP.
Performance
GVUS vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's 16.17% return.
GVUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GVIP
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 36.94%
- 3Y*
- 30.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- —
GVUS vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 14.24% | 15.90% | 14.08% | 5.51% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 16.17% | 25.27% | 29.82% | 3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVUS and GVIP is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between GVUS and GVIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
GVUS vs. GVIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVUS
GVIP
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
GVUS
GVIP
Technology
GVUS
GVIP
Industrials
GVUS
GVIP
Healthcare
GVUS
GVIP
Communication Services
GVUS
GVIP
Consumer Cyclical
GVUS
GVIP
Consumer Defensive
GVUS
GVIP
Energy
GVUS
GVIP
-
Utilities
GVUS
GVIP
Real Estate
GVUS
GVIP
-
Basic Materials
GVUS
GVIP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVUS vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank
GVUS
GVIP
GVUS vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVUS | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.36 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 2.71 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.70 | 11.81 | +5.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVUS | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 2.05 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 0.82 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
GVUS vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and GVIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVUS | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -37.09% | +21.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -13.67% | +6.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.33% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -7.59% | +5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 3.14% | -1.54% |
Volatility
GVUS vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) is 3.01%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that GVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVUS | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 5.42% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 14.47% | -6.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.86% | 18.13% | -7.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 21.29% | -8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 21.65% | -8.37% |
GVUS vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVUS vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison
GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than GVIP's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 0.29% | 0.34% | 0.29% | 0.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.77% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% |
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 1.58% | 1.77% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVUS and GVIP have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVIP has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to GVUS (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs GVIP's -37.09%.
On 1-year performance, GVIP leads with 36.94% vs 28.22% for GVUS. On fees, GVUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GVUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GVIP has performed better with a 36.94% return vs 28.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GVUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.
GVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.
GVUS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GVIP is Large Cap Growth Equities. GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.45% for GVIP.
GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVUS and GVIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer