GVLU vs. IMCV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GVLU (Gotham 1000 Value ETF) and IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. GVLU is actively managed, while IMCV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GVLU returned 15.01%/yr vs 16.54%/yr for IMCV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GVLU charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMCV.

Performance

GVLU vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVLU achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly lower than IMCV's 11.06% return.

GVLU

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 5.62%
• 6M: 4.60%
• 1Y: 16.60%
• 3Y*: 15.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMCV

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 10.33%
• 1Y: 23.30%
• 3Y*: 16.54%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVLU vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GVLU Gotham 1000 Value ETF	5.62%	11.24%	11.09%	18.02%	-4.22%
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	11.06%	13.52%	12.28%	11.89%	-6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GVLU and IMCV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2022	0.93

The correlation between GVLU and IMCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

GVLU vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GVLU	IMCV
Consumer Cyclical	17.3%	9.1%
Technology	16.6%	10.3%
Financial Services	14.9%	15.2%
Healthcare	11.9%	8.7%
Industrials	10.2%	11.8%
Consumer Defensive	9.2%	9.0%
Energy	8.9%	11.9%
Basic Materials	6.5%	6.4%
Communication Services	3.4%	2.5%
Real Estate	0.7%	5.5%
Utilities	0.4%	9.6%

Return for Risk

GVLU vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVLU

GVLU Risk / Return Rank: 39
GVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
GVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
GVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
GVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 43

IMCV

IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 67
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVLU vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GVLU	IMCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.99	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	2.89	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.35	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	3.39	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.55	12.59	-6.04

GVLU vs. IMCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the IMCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVLU and IMCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GVLU vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVLU drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVLU and IMCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GVLU	IMCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.82%	-64.74%	+43.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.14%	-6.90%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.82%	-18.63%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.79%	-0.88%	-1.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.14%	-8.40%	+4.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	1.86%	+0.68%

Volatility

GVLU vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison

Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GVLU	IMCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.19%	3.11%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.11%	8.12%	+0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.42%	11.75%	+1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.72%	16.62%	+1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.72%	19.61%	-1.89%

GVLU vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVLU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

GVLU vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

GVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than IMCV's 1.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GVLU Gotham 1000 Value ETF	6.10%	6.44%	2.88%	1.62%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.91%	2.23%	2.36%	2.30%	2.36%	1.86%	2.61%	2.45%	2.61%	1.87%	2.09%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GVLU and IMCV in my portfolio?

GVLU and IMCV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GVLU or IMCV?

GVLU has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to IMCV (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVLU dropped -20.82% vs IMCV's -64.74%.

Which ETF is better, GVLU or IMCV?

On 3-year performance, IMCV leads with 16.54% vs 15.01% for GVLU. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GVLU or IMCV?

Over the 3-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 16.54% return vs 15.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GVLU or IMCV?

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GVLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GVLU or IMCV?

GVLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.10%, compared with 1.91% for IMCV.

What is the main difference between GVLU and IMCV?

They also come from different issuers: Gotham and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GVLU and 0.06% for IMCV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.