GUSH vs. TNA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - GUSH tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%) while TNA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GUSH returned -36.52%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for TNA. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GUSH charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TNA.

Performance

GUSH vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 61.19% return, which is significantly higher than TNA's 53.14% return. Over the past 10 years, GUSH has underperformed TNA with an annualized return of -36.52%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively higher 8.78% annualized return.

GUSH

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: -5.00%
• YTD: 61.19%
• 6M: 49.15%
• 1Y: 49.53%
• 3Y*: 8.93%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: -36.52%

TNA

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: 8.84%
• YTD: 53.14%
• 6M: 40.13%
• 1Y: 117.40%
• 3Y*: 25.74%
• 5Y*: -6.50%
• 10Y*: 8.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSH vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	61.19%	-19.39%	-12.73%	-7.23%	66.47%	129.94%	-97.38%	-52.68%	-74.28%	-40.21%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	53.14%	9.82%	7.21%	26.24%	-62.48%	27.88%	-7.82%	71.88%	-39.89%	39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSH and TNA is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between GUSH and TNA has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GUSH vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GUSH	TNA
Energy	97.2%	6.2%
Basic Materials	2.9%	4.8%
Communication Services	-	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.4%
Financial Services	-	15.9%
Healthcare	-	16.5%
Industrials	-	17.5%
Real Estate	-	6.2%
Technology	-	16.9%
Utilities	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

GUSH vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSH

GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 31
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 28
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 30

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 68
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSH vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GUSH	TNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	2.01	-1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	2.48	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.29	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	3.63	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	11.92	-8.14

GUSH vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSH Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSH and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GUSH vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than TNA's maximum drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and TNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUSH	TNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-88.09%	-11.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.94%	-32.53%	+3.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.59%	-65.78%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.64%	-82.36%	+8.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.94%	-88.09%	-11.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.80%	-35.23%	-64.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-92.90%	-33.92%	-58.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.16%	9.91%	+3.25%

Volatility

GUSH vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) is 18.07%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 21.54%. This indicates that GUSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GUSH	TNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.07%	21.54%	-3.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.41%	42.61%	+1.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.06%	58.70%	-2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.35%	67.57%	+0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.58%	68.54%	+25.04%

GUSH vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

GUSH vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than TNA's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	1.55%	2.60%	2.96%	3.00%	0.47%	0.00%	0.20%	1.68%	0.17%	0.00%	3.26%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.39%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUSH and TNA in my portfolio?

GUSH and TNA have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GUSH or TNA?

TNA has higher volatility (21.54%) compared to GUSH (18.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs TNA's -88.09%.

Which ETF is better, GUSH or TNA?

On 10-year performance, TNA leads with 8.78% vs -36.52% for GUSH. On fees, TNA is cheaper at 1.14% per year. On volatility, GUSH has been the lower-risk option at 18.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GUSH or TNA?

Over the 10-year period, TNA has performed better with a 8.78% return vs -36.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GUSH or TNA?

TNA is cheaper with a 1.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GUSH or TNA?

GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.39% for TNA.

What is the main difference between GUSH and TNA?

GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 1.14% for TNA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.