GUSH vs. TERG
GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. GUSH is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. GUSH charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
GUSH vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 62.18% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 112.05% return.
GUSH
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 54.35%
- YTD
- 62.18%
- 1Y
- 44.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- -36.10%
TERG
- 1D
- 7.19%
- 1M
- -31.38%
- 6M
- 53.87%
- YTD
- 112.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 62.18% | -11.31% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 112.05% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSH and TERG is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSH vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
GUSH
TERG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GUSH vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSH | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSH vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -53.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSH | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -53.47% | -46.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.80% | -50.12% | -49.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.95% | -16.07% | -76.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.62% | — | — |
Volatility
GUSH vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSH | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.53% | 154.77% | -98.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.86% | 154.77% | -86.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.98% | 154.77% | -61.79% |
GUSH vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSH vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.34% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSH and TERG have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for GUSH and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer