PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSE vs. UNOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSE vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than UNOV's 6.21% return.


GUSE

1D
0.76%
1M
0.25%
6M
9.66%
YTD
11.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

UNOV

1D
0.47%
1M
0.70%
6M
5.32%
YTD
6.21%
1Y
11.32%
3Y*
9.02%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$364.55K$258.31K$277.29K
$195.76K$176.12K$1.52M

GUSE vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GUSE and UNOV is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSE vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GUSE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


UNOV
UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GUSE vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUSEUNOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.07

GUSE vs. UNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUSE vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum UNOV drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and UNOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSEUNOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-13.84%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.11%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-1.63%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

Volatility

GUSE vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSEUNOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

6.01%

+7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

6.93%

+6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

7.70%

+6.13%

GUSE vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSE vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison

GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, GUSE and UNOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UNOV.

GUSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.

GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UNOV is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.79% for UNOV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSE and UNOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer