GUSE vs. CNAV
GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.
Performance
GUSE vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 45.35% return.
GUSE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNAV
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 15.60%
- YTD
- 45.35%
- 6M
- 44.98%
- 1Y
- 69.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSE vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 11.96% | 2.91% |
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 45.35% | 4.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSE and CNAV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSE vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank
GUSE
CNAV
GUSE vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUSE | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.20 | 1.57 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
GUSE vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and CNAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSE | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -30.06% | +21.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -1.30% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -5.41% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.03% | — |
Volatility
GUSE vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSE | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 25.12% | -11.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 27.15% | -13.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 27.15% | -13.47% |
GUSE vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSE vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison
GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSE and CNAV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.
GUSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 1.31% for CNAV.
Find the right allocation for GUSE and CNAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer