GUSE vs. DCMT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

GUSE vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 19.96% return.

GUSE

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -0.47%
• YTD: 9.12%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DCMT

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -11.03%
• YTD: 19.96%
• 6M: 18.79%
• 1Y: 22.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSE vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF	9.12%	2.38%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	19.96%	-0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSE and DCMT is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	-0.23

Return for Risk

GUSE vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 37
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 34
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSE vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GUSE	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.21	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.72	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.60	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.23	—

Drawdowns

GUSE vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -13.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUSE	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.54%	-13.89%	+5.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	-13.89%	+10.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.42%	-3.29%	+1.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GUSE	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.29%	18.53%	-4.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.29%	15.85%	-1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.29%	15.85%	-1.56%

GUSE vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

GUSE vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than DCMT's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	3.06%	3.67%	1.59%
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF	0.67%	0.73%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUSE and DCMT in my portfolio?

GUSE and DCMT have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GUSE or DCMT?

On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GUSE or DCMT?

GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GUSE or DCMT?

DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.67% for GUSE.

What is the main difference between GUSE and DCMT?

GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.66% for DCMT.