GUSE vs. GHYB
GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and GHYB (Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GHYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. GUSE is actively managed, while GHYB is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for GHYB.
Performance
GUSE vs. GHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than GHYB's 1.53% return.
GUSE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHYB
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- —
GUSE vs. GHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 11.48% | 2.38% |
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.53% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSE and GHYB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSE vs. GHYB — Risk / Return Rank
GUSE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GHYB
GUSE vs. GHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSE | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSE vs. GHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum GHYB drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and GHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSE | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -21.48% | +12.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.46% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -2.54% | +1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.58% | — |
Volatility
GUSE vs. GHYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSE | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 3.48% | +10.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 7.70% | +6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 8.24% | +5.71% |
GUSE vs. GHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSE vs. GHYB - Dividend Comparison
GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than GHYB's 6.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.76% | 7.00% | 6.65% | 6.20% | 5.67% | 4.46% | 4.75% | 5.57% | 5.68% | 1.45% |
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSE and GHYB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for GHYB.
GHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 0.65% for GUSE.
GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GHYB is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.34% for GHYB.
Find the right allocation for GUSE and GHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer