PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSE vs. GHYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSE vs. GHYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly higher than GHYB's 1.32% return.


GUSE

1D
0.30%
1M
5.04%
YTD
11.96%
6M
11.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GHYB

1D
0.16%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.69%
1Y
6.90%
3Y*
8.66%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSE vs. GHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GUSE and GHYB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSE vs. GHYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSE

GHYB
GHYB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSE vs. GHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GUSE vs. GHYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUSEGHYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.20

0.55

+1.65

Drawdowns

GUSE vs. GHYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum GHYB drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and GHYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSEGHYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-21.48%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.20%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.33%

-2.57%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

Volatility

GUSE vs. GHYB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSEGHYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

3.50%

+10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.68%

7.69%

+5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.68%

8.28%

+5.40%

GUSE vs. GHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYB's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSE vs. GHYB - Dividend Comparison

GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than GHYB's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHYB
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.80%7.00%6.65%6.20%5.67%4.46%4.75%5.57%5.68%1.45%
GUSE
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF
0.65%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUSE and GHYB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for GHYB.

GHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.80%, compared with 0.65% for GUSE.

GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GHYB is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.34% for GHYB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSE and GHYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer