GUSE vs. SPTM
GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GUSE is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
GUSE vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GUSE having a 11.62% return and SPTM slightly lower at 11.10%.
GUSE
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
GUSE vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 11.62% | 2.91% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.10% | 2.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSE and SPTM is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSE vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
GUSE
SPTM
GUSE vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUSE | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.16 | 0.46 | +1.70 |
Drawdowns
GUSE vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSE | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -54.80% | +46.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.67% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -9.05% | +7.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
GUSE vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSE | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 11.88% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 16.87% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 18.03% | -4.30% |
GUSE vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSE vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than SPTM's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, GUSE and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GUSE.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.65% for GUSE.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.03% for SPTM.
Find the right allocation for GUSE and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer