GUSA vs. IUS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GUSA (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GUSA tracks the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross while IUS tracks the Invesco Strategic US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GUSA returned 22.50%/yr vs 21.21%/yr for IUS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GUSA charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.

Performance

GUSA vs. IUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSA achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 16.26% return.

GUSA

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 6M: 11.21%
• 1Y: 28.15%
• 3Y*: 22.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IUS

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 16.26%
• 6M: 16.49%
• 1Y: 34.28%
• 3Y*: 21.21%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSA vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF	11.29%	17.51%	24.46%	26.61%	-12.69%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	16.26%	16.94%	16.51%	20.79%	-7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSA and IUS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2022	0.92

The correlation between GUSA and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

GUSA vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GUSA	IUS
Technology	34.0%	22.4%
Financial Services	11.6%	6.8%
Communication Services	11.1%	14.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	10.7%
Industrials	9.4%	9.7%
Healthcare	8.8%	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	7.4%
Energy	3.6%	10.9%
Utilities	2.3%	1.0%
Real Estate	2.2%	0.5%
Basic Materials	2.0%	3.3%

Return for Risk

GUSA vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSA

GUSA Risk / Return Rank: 71
GUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
GUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
GUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
GUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

IUS

IUS Risk / Return Rank: 92
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSA vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GUSA	IUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	3.36	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	4.65	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.61	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	5.60	-2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.45	23.98	-9.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GUSA vs. IUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is lower than the IUS Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSA and IUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GUSA	IUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	3.36	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.86	+0.03

Drawdowns

GUSA vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSA drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSA and IUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUSA	IUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.61%	-34.67%	+15.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-6.15%	-2.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.61%	-15.61%	-4.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	0.00%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.38%	-3.86%	-0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	1.43%	+0.52%

Volatility

GUSA vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 2.39%. This indicates that GUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GUSA	IUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	2.39%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.29%	7.42%	+1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.20%	10.26%	+1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.26%	15.00%	+2.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.26%	18.04%	-0.78%

GUSA vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSA has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GUSA vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison

GUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than IUS's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF	0.96%	0.99%	1.16%	1.36%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	1.28%	1.48%	1.52%	1.72%	1.78%	1.46%	1.74%	1.77%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUSA and IUS in my portfolio?

GUSA and IUS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GUSA or IUS?

GUSA has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to IUS (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSA dropped -19.61% vs IUS's -34.67%.

Which ETF is better, GUSA or IUS?

On 3-year performance, GUSA leads with 22.50% vs 21.21% for IUS. On fees, GUSA is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GUSA or IUS?

Over the 3-year period, GUSA has performed better with a 22.50% return vs 21.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GUSA or IUS?

GUSA is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GUSA or IUS?

IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.96% for GUSA.

What is the main difference between GUSA and IUS?

GUSA tracks Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for GUSA and 0.19% for IUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.