IUS vs. IUSG
IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Invesco Strategic US Index, while IUSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUS returned 13.86%/yr vs 14.44%/yr for IUSG. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.
Performance
IUS vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUS achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly higher than IUSG's 11.77% return.
IUS
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 14.22%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 31.51%
- 3Y*
- 25.98%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
IUS vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 14.45% | 16.94% | 16.51% | 20.79% | -8.34% | 32.17% | 15.09% | 29.34% | -12.28% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 11.77% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 30.62% | -13.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUS and IUSG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IUS and IUSG shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUS vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUS
IUSG
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IUS
IUSG
Communication Services
IUS
IUSG
Healthcare
IUS
IUSG
Consumer Cyclical
IUS
IUSG
Industrials
IUS
IUSG
Energy
IUS
IUSG
Consumer Defensive
IUS
IUSG
Financial Services
IUS
IUSG
Basic Materials
IUS
IUSG
Utilities
IUS
IUSG
Real Estate
IUS
IUSG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUS vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
IUS
IUSG
IUS vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUS | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.33 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.13 | 2.42 | +2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.42 | 9.93 | +11.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUS vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUS drawdown since its inception was -34.67%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUS | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.67% | -63.41% | +28.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -13.07% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -22.28% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | -32.21% | +13.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -2.99% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -21.40% | +17.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 3.18% | -1.71% |
Volatility
IUS vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) is 3.84%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that IUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUS | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 6.76% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 13.49% | -5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 16.78% | -6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 21.03% | -6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 20.50% | -2.47% |
IUS vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUS vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
IUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than IUSG's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 1.62% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.78% | 1.46% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUS and IUSG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IUSG has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to IUS (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUS dropped -34.67% vs IUSG's -63.41%.
On 5-year performance, IUSG leads with 14.44% vs 13.86% for IUS. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 14.44% return vs 13.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IUS.
IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.49% for IUSG.
IUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IUSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IUS and 0.04% for IUSG.
IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUS and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer