IUS vs. QLV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV).
IUS and QLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Invesco Strategic US Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2018. QLV is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2019. Both IUS and QLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IUS vs. QLV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IUS vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 1.70% | 16.94% | 16.51% | 20.79% | -8.34% | 32.17% | 15.09% | 8.40% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 0.10% | 12.28% | 18.08% | 13.71% | -9.97% | 26.08% | 9.63% | 6.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUS achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 0.10% return.
IUS
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- 1Y
- 19.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- —
QLV
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 10.86%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUS vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IUS vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank
IUS
QLV
IUS vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUS | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.86 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 1.31 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.19 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.19 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 6.18 | +2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUS | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.86 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.83 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.65 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between IUS and QLV is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IUS vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison
IUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than QLV's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 1.46% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.78% | 1.46% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 0.73% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 1.60% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.60% | 1.74% | 0.96% | 1.24% | 0.58% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IUS vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUS drawdown since its inception was -34.67%, roughly equal to the maximum QLV drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS and QLV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUS | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.67% | -33.71% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -9.75% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | -17.93% | -0.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -4.29% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -4.08% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 1.88% | +0.51% |
Volatility
IUS vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 3.18%. This indicates that IUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IUS | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 3.18% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.09% | 5.81% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 12.74% | +3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 12.73% | +2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 16.75% | +1.44% |