GUSA vs. GVIP
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP).
GUSA and GVIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GUSA is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Apr 5, 2022. GVIP is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2016. Both GUSA and GVIP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GUSA vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GUSA vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF | -3.63% | 17.51% | 24.46% | 26.61% | -12.69% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | -4.58% | 25.27% | 29.82% | 39.15% | -21.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSA achieves a -3.63% return, which is significantly higher than GVIP's -4.58% return.
GUSA
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- -3.63%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 18.26%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GVIP
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 6M
- -4.03%
- 1Y
- 25.15%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GUSA vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSA has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GUSA vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank
GUSA
GVIP
GUSA vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUSA | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.08 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.60 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.89 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.11 | 7.35 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUSA | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.08 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.72 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSA and GVIP is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GUSA vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison
GUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than GVIP's 0.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF | 1.11% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 0.35% | 0.34% | 0.29% | 0.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.77% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% |
Drawdowns
GUSA vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSA drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSA and GVIP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSA | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.61% | -37.09% | +17.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -13.67% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -8.63% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -7.71% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 3.51% | -0.88% |
Volatility
GUSA vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) is 5.44%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that GUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GUSA | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 8.50% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 14.60% | -4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.14% | 23.35% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 21.18% | -3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 21.68% | -4.22% |