GTLS vs. LNG
GTLS (Chart Industries, Inc.) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. GTLS operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, GTLS returned 22.42%/yr vs 22.35%/yr for LNG. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GTLS vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTLS achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 24.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GTLS having a 22.42% annualized return and LNG not far behind at 22.35%.
GTLS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 41.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 22.42%
LNG
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- -10.35%
- YTD
- 24.63%
- 6M
- 16.53%
- 1Y
- 1.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 23.68%
- 10Y*
- 22.35%
GTLS vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTLS Chart Industries, Inc. | 0.63% | 8.06% | 39.98% | 18.31% | -27.75% | 35.40% | 74.53% | 3.78% | 38.78% | 30.09% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 24.63% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTLS and LNG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2006 | 0.35 |
The correlation between GTLS and LNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GTLS:
-$0.77
LNG:
$6.80
GTLS:
1.70
LNG:
2.58
GTLS:
$4.15B
LNG:
$20.28B
GTLS:
$1.30B
LNG:
$5.52B
GTLS:
$457.00M
LNG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTLS vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
GTLS
LNG
GTLS vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTLS | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.05 | 1.03 | +1.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.48 | 0.04 | +6.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.86 | 0.09 | +32.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTLS | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 0.04 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.79 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.69 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.16 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
GTLS vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTLS drawdown since its inception was -90.06%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLS and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTLS | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.06% | -97.84% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.49% | -24.09% | +17.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.30% | -24.87% | -22.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.01% | -24.87% | -32.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.56% | -57.53% | -25.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.34% | -18.62% | +5.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.85% | -43.17% | +4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | 11.55% | -10.27% |
Volatility
GTLS vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) is 0.91%, while Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a volatility of 10.01%. This indicates that GTLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTLS | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | 10.01% | -9.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.49% | 21.83% | -20.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 27.73% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.41% | 30.29% | +22.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.84% | 32.66% | +21.18% |
Dividends
GTLS vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
GTLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTLS Chart Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.90% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% |
Financials
GTLS vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chart Industries, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GTLS vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison
GTLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chart Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 251.40M and revenue of 884.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.4%.
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GTLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chart Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 52.60M and revenue of 884.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
GTLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chart Industries, Inc. reported a net income of -17.10M and revenue of 884.80M, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GTLS and LNG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNG has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to GTLS (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTLS dropped -90.06% vs LNG's -97.84%.
GTLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTLS and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer