PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTLS vs. AVGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GTLS vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLS achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than AVGO's 21.29% return. Over the past 10 years, GTLS has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 22.42%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 41.92% annualized return.


GTLS

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
0.63%
6M
1.18%
1Y
41.85%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
22.42%

AVGO

1D
-12.59%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
21.29%
6M
10.38%
1Y
61.75%
3Y*
75.80%
5Y*
57.68%
10Y*
41.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTLS vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
0.63%8.06%39.98%18.31%-27.75%35.40%74.53%3.78%38.78%30.09%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
21.29%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%44.88%29.05%2.18%48.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GTLS and AVGO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2009

0.36

The correlation between GTLS and AVGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

GTLS:

-$0.77

AVGO:

$6.01

PS Ratio

GTLS:

1.70

AVGO:

27.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

GTLS:

$4.15B

AVGO:

$75.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GTLS:

$1.30B

AVGO:

$50.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

GTLS:

$457.00M

AVGO:

$41.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTLS vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLS
GTLS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTLS vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTLSAVGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.05

1.26

+0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.48

2.17

+4.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.86

5.19

+27.67

GTLS vs. AVGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLS and AVGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTLSAVGODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

1.39

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

1.34

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

1.07

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.10

-0.86

Drawdowns

GTLS vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLS drawdown since its inception was -90.06%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLS and AVGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTLSAVGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.06%

-48.30%

-41.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-28.67%

+22.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.30%

-41.15%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.01%

-41.15%

-15.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.56%

-48.30%

-34.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.34%

-13.01%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.85%

-7.97%

-30.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

11.94%

-10.66%

Volatility

GTLS vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) is 0.91%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 18.29%. This indicates that GTLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTLSAVGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

18.29%

-17.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.49%

33.56%

-32.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.59%

44.74%

-21.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.41%

43.15%

+9.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.84%

39.38%

+14.46%

Dividends

GTLS vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

GTLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.59%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GTLS vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chart Industries, Inc. and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
884.80M
22.19B
(GTLS) Total Revenue
(AVGO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GTLS vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chart Industries, Inc. and Broadcom Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
28.4%
67.2%
Portfolio components
GTLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chart Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 251.40M and revenue of 884.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.4%.

AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

GTLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chart Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 52.60M and revenue of 884.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

GTLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chart Industries, Inc. reported a net income of -17.10M and revenue of 884.80M, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GTLS and AVGO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGO has higher volatility (18.29%) compared to GTLS (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTLS dropped -90.06% vs AVGO's -48.30%.

GTLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTLS and AVGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer