GTIP vs. VTP
GTIP (Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - GTIP tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index while VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GTIP charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.
Performance
GTIP vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTIP achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 1.55% return.
GTIP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- —
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTIP vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 1.70% | 2.10% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTIP and VTP is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTIP vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
GTIP
VTP
GTIP vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTIP | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTIP | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.31 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
GTIP vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTIP drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIP and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTIP | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -1.92% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.30% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -0.52% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | — | — |
Volatility
GTIP vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTIP | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 3.26% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.07% | 3.26% | +2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 3.26% | +2.75% |
GTIP vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GTIP vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
GTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 4.69% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.77% | 6.47% | 3.82% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.66% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GTIP and VTP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GTIP.
GTIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
GTIP tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GTIP and 0.05% for VTP.
Find the right allocation for GTIP and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer