GTIP vs. RBIL
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL).
GTIP and RBIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GTIP is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. RBIL is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2025. Both GTIP and RBIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GTIP vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTIP vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 0.49% | 3.78% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 1.65% | 2.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTIP achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 1.65% return.
GTIP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTIP vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GTIP vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
GTIP
RBIL
GTIP vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTIP | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 3.76 | -3.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 6.07 | -5.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 2.00 | -0.87 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 7.98 | -6.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 35.17 | -31.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTIP | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 3.76 | -3.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 4.10 | -3.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTIP and RBIL is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GTIP vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
GTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, which matches RBIL's 4.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 4.43% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.77% | 6.47% | 3.82% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.66% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.42% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GTIP vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTIP drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIP and RBIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTIP | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -0.50% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -0.50% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -0.08% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -0.06% | -4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.11% | +0.85% |
Volatility
GTIP vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.58%. This indicates that GTIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTIP | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 0.58% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 0.67% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.05% | 1.04% | +3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 1.03% | +5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 1.03% | +5.03% |