PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTIP vs. QDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GTIP vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GTIP vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GTIP
Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF
0.49%6.63%-1.36%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
-5.75%20.16%11.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTIP achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's -5.75% return.


GTIP

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.38%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
3.06%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*

QDVO

1D
3.02%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-5.75%
6M
-3.27%
1Y
20.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GTIP vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GTIP vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTIP
GTIP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTIP vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTIPQDVODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.73

1.12

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

1.77

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.25

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

2.07

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.44

7.80

-4.36

GTIP vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTIP Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTIP and QDVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTIPQDVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

1.12

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.89

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between GTIP and QDVO is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GTIP vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

GTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than QDVO's 11.26% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GTIP
Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF
4.43%4.58%3.52%2.77%6.47%3.82%1.04%2.34%0.66%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
11.26%9.92%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GTIP vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTIP drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum QDVO drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIP and QDVO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GTIPQDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-17.75%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-10.24%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-7.50%

+6.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-2.50%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

2.71%

-1.75%

Volatility

GTIP vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) is 1.42%, while Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that GTIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GTIPQDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

5.31%

-3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

9.74%

-7.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

18.60%

-14.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

18.02%

-11.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

18.02%

-11.96%