GTIP vs. FIPDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX).
GTIP is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. FIPDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 16, 2012.
Performance
GTIP vs. FIPDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTIP vs. FIPDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 0.49% | 6.63% | 2.04% | 3.88% | -12.14% | 5.86% | 10.83% | 8.33% | 0.24% |
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 0.33% | 6.90% | 2.00% | 3.77% | -12.09% | 5.94% | 10.90% | 8.32% | 0.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTIP achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than FIPDX's 0.33% return.
GTIP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
FIPDX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- 2.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTIP vs. FIPDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FIPDX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GTIP vs. FIPDX — Risk / Return Rank
GTIP
FIPDX
GTIP vs. FIPDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTIP | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.83 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 1.17 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 1.37 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 4.30 | -0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTIP | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.83 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.24 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.40 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTIP and FIPDX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GTIP vs. FIPDX - Dividend Comparison
GTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than FIPDX's 4.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 4.43% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.77% | 6.47% | 3.82% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 4.16% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 3.56% | 8.87% | 4.76% | 1.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 1.29% | 1.34% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
GTIP vs. FIPDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTIP drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FIPDX drawdown of -14.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIP and FIPDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTIP | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -14.32% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -2.90% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.31% | -14.32% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -1.40% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -4.52% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.92% | +0.04% |
Volatility
GTIP vs. FIPDX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) have volatilities of 1.42% and 1.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTIP | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.37% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 2.35% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.05% | 4.13% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 5.99% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 5.38% | +0.68% |