PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIPDX vs. FTBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIPDX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIPDX achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than FTBFX's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FIPDX has outperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 2.41%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.16% annualized return.


FIPDX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.44%
6M
0.11%
YTD
0.55%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
2.41%
ALL TIME*
2.16%

FTBFX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.69%
YTD
-0.46%
1Y
2.07%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*
2.16%
ALL TIME*
3.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIPDX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIPDX
Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
0.55%6.90%2.00%3.77%-12.09%5.94%10.90%8.32%-1.37%2.98%
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
-0.46%7.50%2.13%7.25%-13.58%-0.44%9.34%9.89%-0.66%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FIPDX and FTBFX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2012

0.78

The correlation between FIPDX and FTBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIPDX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIPDX
FIPDX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FIPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FIPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FTBFX
FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIPDX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIPDXFTBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.11

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

2.83

+0.56

FIPDX vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIPDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIPDX and FTBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIPDX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIPDX drawdown since its inception was -14.32%, smaller than the maximum FTBFX drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIPDX and FTBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIPDXFTBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.32%

-18.25%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

-2.89%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.95%

-4.96%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.32%

-18.25%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.32%

-18.25%

+3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-2.31%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-2.31%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

1.13%

-0.40%

Volatility

FIPDX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) is 0.76%, while Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that FIPDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIPDXFTBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

1.04%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

3.00%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

3.76%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.96%

5.68%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

4.74%

+0.62%

FIPDX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIPDX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIPDX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

FIPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than FTBFX's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIPDX
Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
4.36%4.18%3.75%3.56%8.87%4.76%1.24%1.97%2.26%1.29%1.34%0.38%
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
4.03%4.36%4.15%4.15%2.54%1.89%5.22%3.03%3.19%2.97%3.61%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIPDX and FTBFX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTBFX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to FIPDX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIPDX dropped -14.32% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.

FTBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIPDX and FTBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer