PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIPDX vs. TIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIPDX vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIPDX achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 0.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIPDX having a 2.52% annualized return and TIP not far behind at 2.43%.


FIPDX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.89%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
2.52%

TIP

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
3.52%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIPDX vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIPDX
Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
0.78%6.90%2.00%3.77%-12.09%5.94%10.90%8.32%-1.37%2.98%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
0.74%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FIPDX and TIP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2012

0.95

The correlation between FIPDX and TIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIPDX vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIPDX
FIPDX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FIPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FIPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIPDX vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIPDXTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.70

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.46

4.99

+0.47

FIPDX vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIPDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIPDX and TIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIPDX vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIPDX drawdown since its inception was -14.32%, roughly equal to the maximum TIP drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIPDX and TIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIPDXTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.32%

-14.57%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

-1.98%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.49%

-4.54%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.32%

-14.51%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.32%

-14.51%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-1.11%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-3.43%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.67%

0.00%

Volatility

FIPDX vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) is 1.13%, while iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that FIPDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIPDXTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

1.22%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

2.47%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36%

3.44%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

6.20%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

5.74%

-0.37%

FIPDX vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIPDX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TIP's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIPDX vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

FIPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, which matches TIP's 3.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIPDX
Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.82%4.18%3.75%3.56%8.87%4.76%1.24%1.97%2.26%1.29%1.34%0.38%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
3.79%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FIPDX and TIP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TIP has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to FIPDX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIPDX dropped -14.32% vs TIP's -14.57%.

FIPDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIPDX and TIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer