GTIP vs. CPII
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII).
GTIP and CPII are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GTIP is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. CPII is an actively managed fund by Ionic. It was launched on Jun 28, 2022.
Performance
GTIP vs. CPII - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTIP vs. CPII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 0.49% | 6.63% | 2.04% | 3.88% | -3.52% |
CPII Ionic Inflation Protection ETF | 1.67% | 2.76% | 6.05% | 1.79% | 1.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTIP achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than CPII's 1.67% return.
GTIP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
CPII
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTIP vs. CPII - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CPII's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GTIP vs. CPII — Risk / Return Rank
GTIP
CPII
GTIP vs. CPII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTIP | CPII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.54 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 0.79 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.11 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 1.36 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 3.02 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTIP | CPII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.54 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.60 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTIP and CPII is -0.29. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GTIP vs. CPII - Dividend Comparison
GTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than CPII's 4.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 4.43% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.77% | 6.47% | 3.82% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.66% |
CPII Ionic Inflation Protection ETF | 4.03% | 4.20% | 5.47% | 5.86% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GTIP vs. CPII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTIP drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, which is greater than CPII's maximum drawdown of -6.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIP and CPII.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTIP | CPII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -6.40% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -1.62% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -1.06% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -1.67% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.73% | +0.23% |
Volatility
GTIP vs. CPII - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) is 1.42%, while Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that GTIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTIP | CPII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 2.03% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 2.44% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.05% | 3.92% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 6.02% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 6.02% | +0.04% |