GTIP vs. CPII

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GTIP (Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF) and CPII (Ionic Inflation Protection ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. GTIP is passively managed, while CPII is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GTIP returned 3.74%/yr vs 4.43%/yr for CPII. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. GTIP charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CPII.

Performance

GTIP vs. CPII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTIP achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly lower than CPII's 2.46% return.

GTIP

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.21%
• 6M: 1.07%
• 1Y: 3.65%
• 3Y*: 3.74%
• 5Y*: 0.98%
• 10Y*: —

CPII

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -1.22%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 3.20%
• 3Y*: 4.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTIP vs. CPII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF	1.21%	6.63%	2.04%	3.88%	-3.71%
CPII Ionic Inflation Protection ETF	2.46%	2.76%	6.05%	1.79%	1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GTIP and CPII is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022	-0.27

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GTIP and CPII has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.27 to -0.03, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Return for Risk

GTIP vs. CPII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTIP

GTIP Risk / Return Rank: 35
GTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
GTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CPII

CPII Risk / Return Rank: 30
CPII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CPII Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CPII Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CPII Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
CPII Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTIP vs. CPII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTIP	CPII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	0.95	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	1.39	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.18	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	1.51	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.63	4.28	+1.35

GTIP vs. CPII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the CPII Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTIP and CPII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GTIP vs. CPII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTIP drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, which is greater than CPII's maximum drawdown of -6.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIP and CPII.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTIP	CPII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.31%	-6.40%	-7.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.02%	-2.13%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.47%	-4.39%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-2.13%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-1.61%	-2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.65%	0.75%	-0.10%

Volatility

GTIP vs. CPII - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) at 0.77%. This indicates that GTIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTIP	CPII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	0.77%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.47%	2.84%	-0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.37%	3.43%	-0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.05%	5.90%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.00%	5.90%	+0.10%

GTIP vs. CPII - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CPII's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTIP vs. CPII - Dividend Comparison

GTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than CPII's 4.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CPII Ionic Inflation Protection ETF	4.12%	4.20%	5.47%	5.86%	2.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF	4.71%	4.58%	3.52%	2.77%	6.47%	3.82%	1.04%	2.34%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTIP and CPII in my portfolio?

GTIP and CPII have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTIP or CPII?

GTIP has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to CPII (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTIP dropped -14.31% vs CPII's -6.40%.

Which ETF is better, GTIP or CPII?

On 3-year performance, CPII leads with 4.43% vs 3.74% for GTIP. On fees, GTIP is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, CPII has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTIP or CPII?

Over the 3-year period, CPII has performed better with a 4.43% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTIP or CPII?

GTIP is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CPII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTIP or CPII?

GTIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 4.12% for CPII.

What is the main difference between GTIP and CPII?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Ionic. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GTIP and 0.74% for CPII.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.