CPII vs. SCHP
Compare and contrast key facts about Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP).
CPII and SCHP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CPII is an actively managed fund by Ionic. It was launched on Jun 28, 2022. SCHP is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010.
Performance
CPII vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CPII vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPII Ionic Inflation Protection ETF | 1.67% | 2.76% | 6.05% | 1.79% | 1.22% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.45% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -3.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPII achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.45% return.
CPII
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- 2.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CPII vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPII has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CPII vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
CPII
SCHP
CPII vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPII | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.74 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.79 | 1.02 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.21 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 3.63 | -0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPII | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.74 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.50 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between CPII and SCHP is -0.29. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CPII vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
CPII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than SCHP's 3.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPII Ionic Inflation Protection ETF | 4.03% | 4.20% | 5.47% | 5.86% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.98% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Drawdowns
CPII vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPII drawdown since its inception was -6.40%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPII and SCHP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPII | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.40% | -14.26% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.62% | -2.78% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -1.26% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -3.98% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.93% | -0.20% |
Volatility
CPII vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.36%. This indicates that CPII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPII | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 1.36% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.44% | 2.22% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.92% | 4.06% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 6.14% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 5.60% | +0.42% |