PortfoliosLab logo
CPII vs. RINF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CPII and RINF is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

CPII vs. RINF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CPII:

0.80

RINF:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

CPII:

0.83

RINF:

0.84

Omega Ratio

CPII:

1.10

RINF:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

CPII:

0.69

RINF:

0.59

Martin Ratio

CPII:

1.64

RINF:

2.15

Ulcer Index

CPII:

1.68%

RINF:

2.09%

Daily Std Dev

CPII:

5.02%

RINF:

7.72%

Max Drawdown

CPII:

-6.40%

RINF:

-43.45%

Current Drawdown

CPII:

-0.90%

RINF:

-0.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPII achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than RINF's 1.57% return.


CPII

YTD

2.31%

1M

-0.29%

6M

3.30%

1Y

3.68%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

RINF

YTD

1.57%

1M

2.44%

6M

3.52%

1Y

3.70%

3Y*

4.15%

5Y*

9.67%

10Y*

3.13%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ionic Inflation Protection ETF

CPII vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPII has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPII vs. RINF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPII
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPII is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPII is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPII is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPII is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPII is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPII is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

RINF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RINF is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RINF is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RINF is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RINF is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RINF is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RINF is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CPII vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CPII Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the RINF Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPII and RINF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CPII vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison

CPII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than RINF's 4.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CPII
Ionic Inflation Protection ETF
5.81%5.47%5.86%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RINF
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF
4.43%4.68%5.07%1.15%2.76%0.83%1.91%2.47%2.99%1.09%1.83%1.42%

Drawdowns

CPII vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPII drawdown since its inception was -6.40%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPII and RINF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CPII vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) is 1.60%, while ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) has a volatility of 1.95%. This indicates that CPII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...