PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSWO vs. GSIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSWO vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSWO having a 11.27% return and GSIE slightly higher at 11.28%.


GSWO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.52%
6M
9.36%
YTD
11.27%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.38%

GSIE

1D
-0.64%
1M
2.31%
6M
7.16%
YTD
11.28%
1Y
24.11%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
9.54%
ALL TIME*
9.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$17.78M$19.71M$20.28M
$3.19M$3.35M$3.82M

GSWO vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GSWO
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF
11.27%18.97%15.29%16.28%-6.15%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
11.28%32.53%5.23%16.99%-8.55%

Correlation

The correlation between GSWO and GSIE is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

0.84

The correlation between GSWO and GSIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSWO vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSWO
GSWO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GSWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GSWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSWO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSWO vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSWOGSIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.22

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.46

8.50

+0.96

GSWO vs. GSIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the GSIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSWO and GSIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSWO vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSWO drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, smaller than the maximum GSIE drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSWO and GSIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSWOGSIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.77%

-34.63%

+16.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-10.76%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.97%

-13.07%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.64%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-5.98%

+2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.80%

-0.84%

Volatility

GSWO vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) is 3.63%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that GSWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSWOGSIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

4.12%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

12.49%

-1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

14.58%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.04%

16.12%

-3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.04%

16.51%

-3.47%

GSWO vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSWO and GSIE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSWO vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison

GSWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than GSIE's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.50%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%
GSWO
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF
1.53%1.74%1.75%2.06%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSWO and GSIE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIE has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to GSWO (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSWO dropped -17.77% vs GSIE's -34.63%.

On 3-year performance, GSWO leads with 17.22% vs 17.11% for GSIE. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, GSWO has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GSWO has performed better with a 17.22% return vs 17.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSWO and GSIE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.53% for GSWO.

GSWO is categorized as Global Equities, while GSIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. GSWO tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index.

GSIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSWO and GSIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer