GSUS vs. SPMO
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 13.64%/yr vs 24.29%/yr for SPMO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
GSUS vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
GSUS vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 10.67% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 32.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and SPMO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between GSUS and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
SPMO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GSUS
SPMO
Communication Services
GSUS
SPMO
Financial Services
GSUS
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
SPMO
Healthcare
GSUS
SPMO
Industrials
GSUS
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
SPMO
Energy
GSUS
SPMO
Utilities
GSUS
SPMO
Real Estate
GSUS
SPMO
Basic Materials
GSUS
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
SPMO
GSUS vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSUS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.64 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | 14.17 | -0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSUS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.62 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 1.27 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 1.01 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -30.95% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -12.70% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -20.13% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -22.74% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | 0.00% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -4.60% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 3.26% | -1.23% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) is 2.91%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that GSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 7.35% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 14.39% | -5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 17.64% | -5.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 19.30% | -2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 20.31% | -3.25% |
GSUS vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSUS vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUS and SPMO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to GSUS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.29% vs 13.64% for GSUS. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GSUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 13.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.
GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.
GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer