PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSUS vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSUS vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.


GSUS

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.33%
6M
9.13%
YTD
10.49%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*

QARP

1D
0.71%
1M
1.10%
6M
9.34%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSUS vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
10.49%18.11%25.25%27.74%-19.82%27.13%34.82%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
12.78%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%30.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GSUS and QARP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020

0.92

The correlation between GSUS and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSUS vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSUS
QARP

Technology

39.3%
23.5%

Communication Services

11.1%
11.3%

Financial Services

10.8%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.6%

Healthcare

8.4%
13.9%

Industrials

7.5%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
9.6%

Energy

3.1%
5.8%

Utilities

2.0%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.0%

Technology

GSUS
39.3%
QARP
23.5%

Communication Services

GSUS
11.1%
QARP
11.3%

Financial Services

GSUS
10.8%
QARP
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GSUS
10.1%
QARP
9.6%

Healthcare

GSUS
8.4%
QARP
13.9%

Industrials

GSUS
7.5%
QARP
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

GSUS
4.5%
QARP
9.6%

Energy

GSUS
3.1%
QARP
5.8%

Utilities

GSUS
2.0%
QARP
2.0%

Basic Materials

GSUS
1.6%
QARP
2.3%

Real Estate

GSUS
1.6%
QARP
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSUS vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSUS
GSUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSUS vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSUSQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.46

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.89

15.38

-5.49

GSUS vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSUS and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSUS vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSUSQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.62%

-35.44%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-7.26%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-15.65%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-22.75%

-2.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

0.00%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-4.39%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.63%

+0.53%

Volatility

GSUS vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that GSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSUSQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

2.76%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

8.22%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

10.58%

+2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

15.54%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

19.55%

-2.52%

GSUS vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSUS vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
0.99%1.04%1.19%1.32%1.51%1.13%0.78%0.00%0.00%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSUS and QARP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSUS has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 12.95% vs 12.09% for QARP. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.99% for GSUS.

GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSUS and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer