PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSUS vs. GVIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSUS vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's 16.17% return.


GSUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.20%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.52%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*

GVIP

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.71%
YTD
16.17%
6M
18.08%
1Y
36.94%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSUS vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
10.67%18.11%25.25%27.74%-19.82%27.13%34.82%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
16.17%25.27%29.82%39.15%-31.95%11.86%52.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GSUS and GVIP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020

0.90

The correlation between GSUS and GVIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSUS vs. GVIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSUS
GVIP

Technology

35.6%
38.6%

Communication Services

11.9%
11.5%

Financial Services

11.7%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
8.0%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.0%

Industrials

8.0%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
1.2%

Energy

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.2%
8.4%

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

GSUS
35.6%
GVIP
38.6%

Communication Services

GSUS
11.9%
GVIP
11.5%

Financial Services

GSUS
11.7%
GVIP
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GSUS
10.2%
GVIP
8.0%

Healthcare

GSUS
8.7%
GVIP
8.0%

Industrials

GSUS
8.0%
GVIP
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

GSUS
4.9%
GVIP
1.2%

Energy

GSUS
3.6%
GVIP

-

Utilities

GSUS
2.2%
GVIP
8.4%

Real Estate

GSUS
1.7%
GVIP

-

Basic Materials

GSUS
1.7%
GVIP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSUS vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSUS
GSUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GVIP
GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSUS vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSUSGVIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.71

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

11.81

+1.89

GSUS vs. GVIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the GVIP Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSUS and GVIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSUSGVIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.05

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.61

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.82

+0.30

Drawdowns

GSUS vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and GVIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSUSGVIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.62%

-37.09%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-13.67%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-23.29%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-37.09%

+11.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.33%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-7.59%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

3.14%

-1.11%

Volatility

GSUS vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) is 2.91%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that GSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSUSGVIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

5.42%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

14.47%

-5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

18.13%

-6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

21.29%

-4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

21.65%

-4.59%

GSUS vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSUS vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison

GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than GVIP's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.04%1.19%1.32%1.51%1.13%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
0.29%0.34%0.29%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.12%0.77%0.44%0.45%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSUS and GVIP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVIP has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to GSUS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs GVIP's -37.09%.

On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 13.64% vs 12.90% for GVIP. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GSUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 12.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.

GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.

GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.45% for GVIP.

GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSUS and GVIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer