GSUS vs. GVIP
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Goldman Sachs - GSUS tracks the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index while GVIP tracks the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 13.64%/yr vs 12.90%/yr for GVIP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GVIP.
Performance
GSUS vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's 16.17% return.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- —
GVIP
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 36.94%
- 3Y*
- 30.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- —
GSUS vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 10.67% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 16.17% | 25.27% | 29.82% | 39.15% | -31.95% | 11.86% | 52.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and GVIP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between GSUS and GVIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. GVIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
GVIP
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
GSUS
GVIP
Communication Services
GSUS
GVIP
Financial Services
GSUS
GVIP
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
GVIP
Healthcare
GSUS
GVIP
Industrials
GSUS
GVIP
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
GVIP
Energy
GSUS
GVIP
-
Utilities
GSUS
GVIP
Real Estate
GSUS
GVIP
-
Basic Materials
GSUS
GVIP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
GVIP
GSUS vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSUS | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 2.71 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | 11.81 | +1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSUS | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.05 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.61 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.82 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and GVIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -37.09% | +11.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -13.67% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -23.29% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -37.09% | +11.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.33% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -7.59% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 3.14% | -1.11% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) is 2.91%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that GSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 5.42% | -2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 14.47% | -5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 18.13% | -6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 21.29% | -4.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 21.65% | -4.59% |
GSUS vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSUS vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than GVIP's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 0.29% | 0.34% | 0.29% | 0.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.77% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUS and GVIP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVIP has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to GSUS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs GVIP's -37.09%.
On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 13.64% vs 12.90% for GVIP. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GSUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 12.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.
GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.
GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.45% for GVIP.
GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and GVIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer