GSUS vs. DLN
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GSUS tracks the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index while DLN tracks the WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 13.64%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
GSUS vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.93% return.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
GSUS vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 10.67% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 9.93% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 25.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and DLN is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between GSUS and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
DLN
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GSUS
DLN
Communication Services
GSUS
DLN
Financial Services
GSUS
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
DLN
Healthcare
GSUS
DLN
Industrials
GSUS
DLN
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
DLN
Energy
GSUS
DLN
Utilities
GSUS
DLN
Real Estate
GSUS
DLN
Basic Materials
GSUS
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
DLN
GSUS vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSUS | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.69 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | 15.59 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSUS | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.53 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.93 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.53 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -57.84% | +32.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -6.10% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -13.71% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -16.26% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.51% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -7.52% | +2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 1.44% | +0.59% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that GSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.17% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 6.77% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 8.87% | +3.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 13.26% | +3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 16.16% | +0.90% |
GSUS vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSUS vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUS and DLN have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSUS has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 13.64% vs 12.22% for DLN. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DLN.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.98% for GSUS.
GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer