PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLN vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLN vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLN achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, DLN has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 12.60%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.


DLN

1D
0.27%
1M
1.58%
6M
9.25%
YTD
13.03%
1Y
21.73%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
12.60%
ALL TIME*
9.86%

DGRW

1D
0.49%
1M
0.69%
6M
6.01%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
13.71%
ALL TIME*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.03M$48.50M$56.54M
$9.42M$12.19M$12.33M

DLN vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLN
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund
13.03%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-5.82%18.22%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
8.57%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DLN and DGRW is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.95

The correlation between DLN and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DLN vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DLN
DGRW

Technology

21.6%
33.8%

Financial Services

17.7%
8.4%

Healthcare

13.4%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.0%
6.7%

Industrials

8.0%
11.8%

Communication Services

7.7%
11.1%

Energy

7.0%
4.5%

Utilities

5.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
8.0%

Real Estate

3.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%
2.8%

Technology

DLN
21.6%
DGRW
33.8%

Financial Services

DLN
17.7%
DGRW
8.4%

Healthcare

DLN
13.4%
DGRW
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

DLN
9.0%
DGRW
6.7%

Industrials

DLN
8.0%
DGRW
11.8%

Communication Services

DLN
7.7%
DGRW
11.1%

Energy

DLN
7.0%
DGRW
4.5%

Utilities

DLN
5.7%
DGRW
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DLN
4.9%
DGRW
8.0%

Real Estate

DLN
3.9%
DGRW

-

Basic Materials

DLN
1.0%
DGRW
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLN vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DLN vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLNDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.26

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.79

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

7.25

+7.09

DLN vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLN Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLN and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLN vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLN drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLN and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLNDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.84%

-32.04%

-25.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-8.30%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.71%

-16.21%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.26%

-17.27%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

-32.04%

-3.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-1.31%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-3.00%

-4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

2.05%

-0.60%

Volatility

DLN vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) is 2.35%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that DLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLNDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

2.92%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

8.33%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.03%

10.44%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.24%

14.01%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

16.18%

-0.06%

DLN vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DLN and DGRW have an expense ratio of 0.28%.


Dividends

DLN vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

DLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than DGRW's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
DLN
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund
1.75%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLN and DGRW have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRW has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to DLN (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLN dropped -57.84% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 13.71% vs 12.60% for DLN. Both ETFs have the same 0.28% expense ratio. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 13.71% return vs 12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DLN and DGRW have the same expense ratio: 0.28% per year.

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.

DLN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DGRW is Quality Factor. DLN tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLN and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer