GSST vs. CSHI
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI).
GSST and CSHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSST is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 15, 2019. CSHI is a passively managed fund by Neos that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Aug 29, 2022.
Performance
GSST vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSST vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 0.76% | 5.20% | 6.01% | 6.08% | 0.59% |
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 1.30% | 5.05% | 5.66% | 6.21% | 1.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSST achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than CSHI's 1.30% return.
GSST
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- —
CSHI
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSST vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSST has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSST vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank
GSST
CSHI
GSST vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSST | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.29 | 2.71 | +3.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 11.28 | 4.01 | +7.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.26 | 2.01 | +1.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.26 | 3.21 | +15.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 113.51 | 28.78 | +84.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSST | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.29 | 2.71 | +3.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 5.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.72 | 4.10 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSST and CSHI is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GSST vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison
GSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than CSHI's 4.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.43% | 4.56% | 5.45% | 4.98% | 1.97% | 0.71% | 1.12% | 1.66% |
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 4.98% | 5.11% | 5.72% | 6.15% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GSST vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSST drawdown since its inception was -3.51%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSST and CSHI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSST | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -1.69% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.25% | -1.69% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -0.03% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.19% | -0.15% |
Volatility
GSST vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) is 0.25%, while Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) has a volatility of 0.39%. This indicates that GSST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSST | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 0.39% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.42% | 0.68% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73% | 2.01% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.63% | 1.35% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.87% | 1.35% | -0.48% |