GSJY vs. DBJP
GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - GSJY tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index while DBJP tracks the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSJY returned 9.36%/yr vs 17.47%/yr for DBJP. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSJY charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.
Performance
GSJY vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 21.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GSJY has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of 9.36%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 17.47% annualized return.
GSJY
- 1D
- -3.94%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 31.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
DBJP
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 21.03%
- 6M
- 21.10%
- 1Y
- 53.92%
- 3Y*
- 28.45%
- 5Y*
- 21.61%
- 10Y*
- 17.47%
GSJY vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 12.58% | 26.22% | 8.89% | 19.18% | -16.15% | 0.41% | 13.81% | 18.29% | -11.56% | 25.50% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 21.03% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSJY and DBJP is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GSJY and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSJY vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSJY
DBJP
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
GSJY
DBJP
Technology
GSJY
DBJP
Financial Services
GSJY
DBJP
Consumer Cyclical
GSJY
DBJP
Communication Services
GSJY
DBJP
Healthcare
GSJY
DBJP
Basic Materials
GSJY
DBJP
Energy
GSJY
DBJP
Consumer Defensive
GSJY
DBJP
Utilities
GSJY
DBJP
Real Estate
GSJY
DBJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSJY vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank
GSJY
DBJP
GSJY vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSJY | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.49 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 5.22 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | 19.97 | -12.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSJY vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, roughly equal to the maximum DBJP drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and DBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSJY | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -31.30% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -10.39% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.96% | -21.50% | +6.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.53% | -21.50% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.53% | -31.30% | -1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -4.33% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -7.27% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 2.71% | +1.58% |
Volatility
GSJY vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) is 7.37%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that GSJY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSJY | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 7.92% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.53% | 15.56% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.44% | 19.90% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 19.18% | -0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 19.31% | -2.21% |
GSJY vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSJY vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than DBJP's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 1.25% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 1.76% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.22% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSJY and DBJP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBJP has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to GSJY (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs DBJP's -31.30%.
On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 17.47% vs 9.36% for GSJY. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSJY has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 17.47% return vs 9.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.
GSJY has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.25% for DBJP.
GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSJY and DBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer