PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSJY vs. DBJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSJY vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 21.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GSJY has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of 9.36%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 17.47% annualized return.


GSJY

1D
-3.94%
1M
1.06%
YTD
12.58%
6M
11.90%
1Y
31.84%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
9.36%

DBJP

1D
-4.33%
1M
3.46%
YTD
21.03%
6M
21.10%
1Y
53.92%
3Y*
28.45%
5Y*
21.61%
10Y*
17.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSJY vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
12.58%26.22%8.89%19.18%-16.15%0.41%13.81%18.29%-11.56%25.50%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
21.03%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.19%13.04%10.53%20.87%-14.82%21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GSJY and DBJP is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2016

0.80

The correlation between GSJY and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSJY vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSJY
DBJP

Industrials

24.9%
24.5%

Technology

20.2%
21.7%

Financial Services

18.1%
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
11.9%

Communication Services

6.4%
8.9%

Healthcare

4.9%
5.6%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.4%

Energy

3.4%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.3%

Utilities

1.5%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.9%

Industrials

GSJY
24.9%
DBJP
24.5%

Technology

GSJY
20.2%
DBJP
21.7%

Financial Services

GSJY
18.1%
DBJP
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GSJY
12.7%
DBJP
11.9%

Communication Services

GSJY
6.4%
DBJP
8.9%

Healthcare

GSJY
4.9%
DBJP
5.6%

Basic Materials

GSJY
3.7%
DBJP
3.4%

Energy

GSJY
3.4%
DBJP
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

GSJY
3.1%
DBJP
3.3%

Utilities

GSJY
1.5%
DBJP
1.0%

Real Estate

GSJY
1.2%
DBJP
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSJY vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSJY
GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSJY vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSJYDBJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.49

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

5.22

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

19.97

-12.53

GSJY vs. DBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSJY Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the DBJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSJY and DBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSJY vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, roughly equal to the maximum DBJP drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and DBJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSJYDBJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-31.30%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-10.39%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-21.50%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.53%

-21.50%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

-31.30%

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-4.33%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-7.27%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

2.71%

+1.58%

Volatility

GSJY vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) is 7.37%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that GSJY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSJYDBJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

7.92%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.53%

15.56%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.44%

19.90%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

19.18%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

19.31%

-2.21%

GSJY vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSJY vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than DBJP's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
1.25%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
1.76%1.99%1.64%2.11%2.13%1.73%1.22%2.79%3.28%1.70%2.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSJY and DBJP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBJP has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to GSJY (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs DBJP's -31.30%.

On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 17.47% vs 9.36% for GSJY. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSJY has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 17.47% return vs 9.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

GSJY has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.25% for DBJP.

GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.45% for DBJP.

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSJY and DBJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer