GSIE vs. IVV
GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSIE returned 9.39%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for IVV. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GSIE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
GSIE vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSIE having a 8.75% return and IVV slightly higher at 8.96%. Over the past 10 years, GSIE has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 9.39%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.93% annualized return.
GSIE
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.80%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 7.81%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 17.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 14.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.98M | $19.56M | $19.60M | |
| $3.37B | $4.55B | $5.92B |
GSIE vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 8.75% | 32.53% | 5.23% | 16.99% | -15.86% | 13.27% | 7.45% | 22.83% | -13.40% | 26.22% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.96% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIE and IVV is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GSIE and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSIE vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSIE
IVV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
GSIE
IVV
Industrials
GSIE
IVV
Technology
GSIE
IVV
Healthcare
GSIE
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
GSIE
IVV
Consumer Defensive
GSIE
IVV
Basic Materials
GSIE
IVV
Energy
GSIE
IVV
Communication Services
GSIE
IVV
Utilities
GSIE
IVV
Real Estate
GSIE
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIE vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
GSIE
IVV
GSIE vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIE | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 2.01 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | 8.66 | -2.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIE vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIE | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.63% | -55.25% | +20.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -8.89% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.07% | -18.75% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | -24.53% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.63% | -33.90% | -0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -2.45% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -10.73% | +4.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.06% | +0.78% |
Volatility
GSIE vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIE | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 3.42% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.39% | 9.93% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 12.69% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 16.98% | -0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 18.05% | -1.56% |
GSIE vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSIE vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than IVV's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.56% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.10% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIE and IVV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSIE has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to IVV (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIE dropped -34.63% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 14.93% vs 9.39% for GSIE. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.
GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.10% for IVV.
GSIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSIE and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSIE and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer