GSID vs. KEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX).
GSID and KEMX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSID is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on May 12, 2020. KEMX is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2019. Both GSID and KEMX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GSID vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSID vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 1.17% | 31.77% | 3.60% | 17.63% | -14.77% | 10.67% | 35.83% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 9.35% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 56.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSID achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 9.35% return.
GSID
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 5.89%
- 1Y
- 23.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- —
KEMX
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -11.07%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 21.09%
- 1Y
- 50.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSID vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSID has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GSID vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank
GSID
KEMX
GSID vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSID | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 2.36 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 3.00 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.44 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 3.25 | -1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 13.60 | -6.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSID | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.36 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.52 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.50 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSID and KEMX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSID vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison
GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than KEMX's 3.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 2.62% | 2.64% | 2.90% | 2.59% | 2.57% | 2.93% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 3.00% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% |
Drawdowns
GSID vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and KEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSID | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -38.80% | +8.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -15.36% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.89% | -30.85% | +0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.27% | -11.68% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -9.02% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 3.67% | -0.70% |
Volatility
GSID vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is 7.74%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that GSID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSID | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 12.58% | -4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 16.96% | -5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.34% | 21.39% | -4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 17.55% | -1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 20.61% | -4.40% |