GSID vs. FID
GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - GSID tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSID returned 8.49%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for FID. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSID charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
GSID vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSID having a 9.52% return and FID slightly higher at 9.78%.
GSID
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 12.61%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- —
FID
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 12.02%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- —
GSID vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 9.52% | 31.77% | 3.60% | 17.63% | -14.77% | 10.67% | 35.83% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 9.78% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSID and FID is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GSID and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSID vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSID
FID
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
GSID
FID
Industrials
GSID
FID
Technology
GSID
FID
Healthcare
GSID
FID
Consumer Cyclical
GSID
FID
Consumer Defensive
GSID
FID
Basic Materials
GSID
FID
Communication Services
GSID
FID
Energy
GSID
FID
Utilities
GSID
FID
Real Estate
GSID
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSID vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
GSID
FID
GSID vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSID | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 2.43 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 3.45 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.43 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 2.82 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 9.89 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSID | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.43 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.48 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.40 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
GSID vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSID | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -39.79% | +9.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -8.93% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -10.97% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.89% | -29.13% | -0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | 0.00% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -8.48% | +2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.55% | +0.49% |
Volatility
GSID vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 2.97%. This indicates that GSID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSID | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 2.97% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 8.04% | +4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.13% | 10.11% | +5.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 17.04% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 18.96% | -2.66% |
GSID vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSID has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSID vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than FID's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.98% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% |
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 2.42% | 2.64% | 2.90% | 2.59% | 2.57% | 2.93% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSID and FID have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSID has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to FID (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSID dropped -29.89% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 5-year performance, GSID leads with 8.49% vs 8.06% for FID. On fees, GSID is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSID has performed better with a 8.49% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSID is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 2.42% for GSID.
GSID tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSID and 0.60% for FID.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSID and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer