GSID vs. FDEV
GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) and FDEV (Fidelity International Multifactor ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - GSID tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index while FDEV tracks the Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSID returned 8.49%/yr vs 7.33%/yr for FDEV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSID charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FDEV.
Performance
GSID vs. FDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSID achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than FDEV's 4.41% return.
GSID
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 12.61%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- —
FDEV
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 7.53%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- —
GSID vs. FDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 9.52% | 31.77% | 3.60% | 17.63% | -14.77% | 10.67% | 35.83% |
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | 4.41% | 30.36% | 5.84% | 13.37% | -16.54% | 11.00% | 26.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSID and FDEV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between GSID and FDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSID vs. FDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSID
FDEV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
GSID
FDEV
Industrials
GSID
FDEV
Technology
GSID
FDEV
Healthcare
GSID
FDEV
Consumer Cyclical
GSID
FDEV
Consumer Defensive
GSID
FDEV
Basic Materials
GSID
FDEV
Communication Services
GSID
FDEV
Energy
GSID
FDEV
Utilities
GSID
FDEV
Real Estate
GSID
FDEV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSID vs. FDEV — Risk / Return Rank
GSID
FDEV
GSID vs. FDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSID | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 1.18 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 1.68 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 1.83 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 6.99 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSID | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.18 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.53 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
GSID vs. FDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, roughly equal to the maximum FDEV drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and FDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSID | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -30.11% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -8.46% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -10.47% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.89% | -29.02% | -0.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -4.30% | +3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -6.29% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.21% | +0.83% |
Volatility
GSID vs. FDEV - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) at 3.72%. This indicates that GSID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSID | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 3.72% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 9.67% | +2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.13% | 11.95% | +3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 13.90% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 15.33% | +0.97% |
GSID vs. FDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSID has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSID vs. FDEV - Dividend Comparison
GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than FDEV's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | 2.81% | 2.86% | 2.99% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.81% | 1.88% | 2.73% |
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 2.42% | 2.64% | 2.90% | 2.59% | 2.57% | 2.93% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSID and FDEV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSID has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to FDEV (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSID dropped -29.89% vs FDEV's -30.11%.
On 5-year performance, GSID leads with 8.49% vs 7.33% for FDEV. On fees, GSID is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FDEV has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSID has performed better with a 8.49% return vs 7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSID is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDEV.
FDEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.42% for GSID.
GSID tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index, while FDEV tracks Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSID and 0.39% for FDEV.
GSID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSID and FDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer