PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEV vs. DYNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEV vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEV achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than DYNF's 11.93% return.


FDEV

1D
0.76%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
4.67%
6M
7.60%
1Y
15.72%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*

DYNF

1D
0.34%
1M
5.19%
YTD
11.93%
6M
11.85%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEV vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
4.67%30.36%5.84%13.37%-16.54%11.00%5.49%7.91%
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
11.93%20.00%30.29%36.25%-20.27%22.12%13.47%14.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEV and DYNF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.69

The correlation between FDEV and DYNF shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDEV vs. DYNF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDEV
DYNF

Financial Services

21.9%
16.2%

Industrials

15.9%
8.4%

Healthcare

13.3%
6.6%

Energy

10.8%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
2.4%

Utilities

8.1%
2.7%

Communication Services

7.2%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
7.8%

Basic Materials

4.1%
0.7%

Technology

3.7%
39.8%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Financial Services

FDEV
21.9%
DYNF
16.2%

Industrials

FDEV
15.9%
DYNF
8.4%

Healthcare

FDEV
13.3%
DYNF
6.6%

Energy

FDEV
10.8%
DYNF
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

FDEV
9.5%
DYNF
2.4%

Utilities

FDEV
8.1%
DYNF
2.7%

Communication Services

FDEV
7.2%
DYNF
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FDEV
4.5%
DYNF
7.8%

Basic Materials

FDEV
4.1%
DYNF
0.7%

Technology

FDEV
3.7%
DYNF
39.8%

Real Estate

FDEV

-

DYNF
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEV vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEV
FDEV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEV vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDEVDYNFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.44

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

3.57

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

17.29

-10.26

FDEV vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEV and DYNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDEVDYNFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.48

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.87

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.83

-0.30

Drawdowns

FDEV vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEV drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEV and DYNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEVDYNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-34.72%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-8.67%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.47%

-18.70%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-28.65%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.06%

-0.24%

-3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-5.97%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.78%

+0.46%

Volatility

FDEV vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) at 3.21%. This indicates that FDEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEVDYNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.21%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

9.55%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

12.44%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

17.49%

-3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

19.90%

-4.57%

FDEV vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEV vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

FDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than DYNF's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
0.88%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
2.81%2.86%2.99%2.80%2.65%2.81%1.88%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDEV and DYNF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDEV has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to DYNF (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEV dropped -30.11% vs DYNF's -34.72%.

On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 15.11% vs 7.17% for FDEV. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DYNF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDEV.

FDEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.88% for DYNF.

FDEV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DYNF is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDEV and 0.30% for DYNF.

DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEV and DYNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer