FDEV vs. DYNF
FDEV (Fidelity International Multifactor ETF) and DYNF (BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDEV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index, while DYNF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. FDEV is passively managed, while DYNF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDEV returned 7.17%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for DYNF. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDEV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DYNF.
Performance
FDEV vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDEV achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than DYNF's 11.93% return.
FDEV
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 4.67%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- 1Y
- 15.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- —
DYNF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 11.93%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 30.76%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FDEV vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | 4.67% | 30.36% | 5.84% | 13.37% | -16.54% | 11.00% | 5.49% | 7.91% |
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 11.93% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 36.25% | -20.27% | 22.12% | 13.47% | 14.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDEV and DYNF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FDEV and DYNF shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDEV vs. DYNF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDEV
DYNF
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FDEV
DYNF
Industrials
FDEV
DYNF
Healthcare
FDEV
DYNF
Energy
FDEV
DYNF
Consumer Defensive
FDEV
DYNF
Utilities
FDEV
DYNF
Communication Services
FDEV
DYNF
Consumer Cyclical
FDEV
DYNF
Basic Materials
FDEV
DYNF
Technology
FDEV
DYNF
Real Estate
FDEV
-
DYNF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDEV vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank
FDEV
DYNF
FDEV vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDEV | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.44 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 3.57 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 17.29 | -10.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDEV | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 2.48 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.87 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.83 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
FDEV vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDEV drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEV and DYNF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDEV | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -34.72% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.46% | -8.67% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.47% | -18.70% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.02% | -28.65% | -0.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | -0.24% | -3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -5.97% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.78% | +0.46% |
Volatility
FDEV vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) at 3.21%. This indicates that FDEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDEV | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 3.21% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 9.55% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 12.44% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 17.49% | -3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 19.90% | -4.57% |
FDEV vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDEV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDEV vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison
FDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than DYNF's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% |
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | 2.81% | 2.86% | 2.99% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.81% | 1.88% | 2.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDEV and DYNF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDEV has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to DYNF (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEV dropped -30.11% vs DYNF's -34.72%.
On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 15.11% vs 7.17% for FDEV. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DYNF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDEV.
FDEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.88% for DYNF.
FDEV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DYNF is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDEV and 0.30% for DYNF.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDEV and DYNF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer