PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEV vs. DYNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEV vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEV achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than DYNF's 12.91% return.


FDEV

1D
0.27%
1M
3.41%
6M
4.85%
YTD
9.54%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.61%

DYNF

1D
1.33%
1M
1.82%
6M
10.87%
YTD
12.91%
1Y
25.30%
3Y*
24.40%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$126.49M$133.52M$166.08M
$1.26M$1.11M$1.22M

FDEV vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
9.54%30.36%5.84%13.37%-16.54%11.00%5.49%8.00%
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
12.91%20.00%30.29%36.25%-20.27%22.12%13.47%14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEV and DYNF is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019

0.68

The correlation between FDEV and DYNF shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDEV vs. DYNF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDEV
DYNF

Financial Services

23.8%
15.0%

Industrials

15.9%
10.4%

Healthcare

13.4%
6.2%

Energy

9.9%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
1.6%

Utilities

8.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

7.6%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
7.0%

Basic Materials

3.9%
0.7%

Technology

3.1%
40.1%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Financial Services

FDEV
23.8%
DYNF
15.0%

Industrials

FDEV
15.9%
DYNF
10.4%

Healthcare

FDEV
13.4%
DYNF
6.2%

Energy

FDEV
9.9%
DYNF
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

FDEV
9.8%
DYNF
1.6%

Utilities

FDEV
8.2%
DYNF
2.2%

Communication Services

FDEV
7.6%
DYNF
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FDEV
4.5%
DYNF
7.0%

Basic Materials

FDEV
3.9%
DYNF
0.7%

Technology

FDEV
3.1%
DYNF
40.1%

Real Estate

FDEV

-

DYNF
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEV vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDEV
FDEV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDEV vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDEVDYNFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.93

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

13.34

-5.32

FDEV vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEV and DYNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDEV vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEV drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEV and DYNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEVDYNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-34.72%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-8.67%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.82%

-18.70%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-28.65%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-5.87%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

1.90%

+0.65%

Volatility

FDEV vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) is 2.97%, while iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that FDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEVDYNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

4.19%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

11.17%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

13.75%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

17.66%

-3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.25%

19.84%

-4.59%

FDEV vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEV vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

FDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than DYNF's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
0.79%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
2.94%2.86%2.99%2.80%2.65%2.81%1.88%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDEV and DYNF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DYNF has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to FDEV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEV dropped -30.11% vs DYNF's -34.72%.

On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 14.60% vs 7.62% for FDEV. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, FDEV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 14.60% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DYNF is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDEV.

FDEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.79% for DYNF.

FDEV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DYNF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDEV and 0.26% for DYNF.

DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEV and DYNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer