GSID vs. CIL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - GSID tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index while CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSID returned 8.49%/yr vs 7.45%/yr for CIL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSID charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

GSID vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSID achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.

GSID

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 9.52%
• 6M: 12.61%
• 1Y: 21.95%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 8.49%
• 10Y*: —

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 16.20%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSID vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF	9.52%	31.77%	3.60%	17.63%	-14.77%	10.67%	35.83%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GSID and CIL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020	0.77

The correlation between GSID and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSID vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSID	CIL
Financial Services	24.1%	24.8%
Industrials	19.8%	18.4%
Technology	10.4%	6.4%
Healthcare	10.4%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	8.8%
Basic Materials	6.1%	6.6%
Communication Services	4.5%	5.8%
Energy	4.2%	4.6%
Utilities	3.9%	6.6%
Real Estate	2.2%	2.2%

Return for Risk

GSID vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSID

GSID Risk / Return Rank: 42
GSID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GSID Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
GSID Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GSID Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GSID Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 73
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSID vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSID	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.07	-0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.96	-0.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.45	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	4.32	-2.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.65	18.62	-10.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSID vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSID Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSID and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSID	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	2.07	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.46	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.43	+0.45

Drawdowns

GSID vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSID	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.89%	-36.27%	+6.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-4.60%	-6.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.96%	-11.96%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.89%	-29.89%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-0.58%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-6.56%	+0.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	1.07%	+1.97%

Volatility

GSID vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that GSID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSID	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	0.00%	+4.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.53%	4.42%	+8.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.13%	8.26%	+6.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	16.49%	-0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.30%	17.18%	-0.88%

GSID vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSID has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSID vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.67%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF	2.42%	2.64%	2.90%	2.59%	2.57%	2.93%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSID and CIL in my portfolio?

GSID and CIL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSID or CIL?

GSID has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSID dropped -29.89% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, GSID or CIL?

On 5-year performance, GSID leads with 8.49% vs 7.45% for CIL. On fees, GSID is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSID or CIL?

Over the 5-year period, GSID has performed better with a 8.49% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSID or CIL?

GSID is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSID or CIL?

GSID has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

What is the main difference between GSID and CIL?

GSID tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSID and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.