PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIB vs. KBWB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GSIB vs. KBWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GSIB vs. KBWB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
-3.15%61.67%32.86%2.35%
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
-5.53%32.05%36.73%0.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIB achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly higher than KBWB's -5.53% return.


GSIB

1D
4.01%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
-3.15%
6M
7.71%
1Y
36.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KBWB

1D
3.56%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
-5.53%
6M
2.34%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
27.16%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSIB vs. KBWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSIB and KBWB have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

GSIB vs. KBWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIB
GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

KBWB
KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIB vs. KBWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIBKBWBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

1.12

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

1.53

+0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

1.88

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.62

5.58

+3.05

GSIB vs. KBWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIB Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the KBWB Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIB and KBWB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIBKBWBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.12

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.15

0.47

+1.68

Correlation

The correlation between GSIB and KBWB is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GSIB vs. KBWB - Dividend Comparison

GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than KBWB's 2.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
1.97%1.91%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
2.27%2.04%2.46%3.20%3.05%2.13%2.62%2.38%2.54%1.35%1.53%1.53%

Drawdowns

GSIB vs. KBWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIB drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum KBWB drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIB and KBWB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIBKBWBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-50.27%

+32.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

-16.38%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.87%

-12.21%

+2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-11.82%

+9.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

5.51%

-1.26%

Volatility

GSIB vs. KBWB - Volatility Comparison

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) at 6.61%. This indicates that GSIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GSIBKBWBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.69%

6.61%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

15.99%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

26.00%

-5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

26.65%

-8.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

29.25%

-10.86%