GSGO vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GSGO (Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

GSGO vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 58.71% return.

GSGO

• 1D: -3.46%
• 1M: 2.75%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 6M: 7.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -12.84%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 58.71%
• 6M: 39.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGO vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF	8.99%	1.36%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	58.71%	-1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGO and MEME is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

GSGO vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSGO	MEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.01	+1.09

Drawdowns

GSGO vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSGO	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.88%	-48.78%	+34.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-16.61%	+12.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.94%	-29.66%	+26.72%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSGO	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.46%	75.50%	-57.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.46%	75.50%	-57.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.46%	75.50%	-57.04%

GSGO vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSGO vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither GSGO nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSGO and MEME in my portfolio?

GSGO and MEME have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GSGO or MEME?

On fees, GSGO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSGO or MEME?

GSGO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSGO or MEME?

GSGO and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GSGO and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 0.69% for MEME.