GSGO vs. GUSH
GSGO (Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF) and GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GSGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GUSH is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). GSGO is actively managed, while GUSH is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. GSGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for GUSH.
Performance
GSGO vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 63.29% return.
GSGO
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- 63.29%
- 6M
- 40.03%
- 1Y
- 74.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- -37.79%
GSGO vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 8.99% | 1.36% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 63.29% | -7.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSGO and GUSH is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSGO vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank
GSGO
GUSH
GSGO vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSGO | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | -0.44 | +1.53 |
Drawdowns
GSGO vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and GUSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSGO | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -99.98% | +86.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.79% | -99.80% | +96.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -92.92% | +89.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.67% | — |
Volatility
GSGO vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSGO | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 55.60% | -37.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 68.24% | -49.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 93.69% | -75.23% |
GSGO vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSGO vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison
GSGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.53% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSGO and GUSH have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSGO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSGO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for GSGO.
GSGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GUSH is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 1.17% for GUSH.
Find the right allocation for GSGO and GUSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer