GSEW vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GSEW is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSEW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

GSEW vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GSEW

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 3.38%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 6M: 10.52%
• 1Y: 19.76%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: 8.84%
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEW vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	1.20%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and GRW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.70

GSEW vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSEW	GRW
Technology	20.9%	26.6%
Industrials	15.6%	38.1%
Financial Services	14.3%	9.8%
Healthcare	11.3%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	8.3%
Utilities	5.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	-
Energy	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.6%	4.0%
Real Estate	4.0%	-
Communication Services	3.5%	9.1%

Return for Risk

GSEW vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEW

GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 51
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 46
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEW vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSEW	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.83	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSEW	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	13.58	-12.96

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSEW	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.65%	-0.45%	-38.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.27%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.89%	-0.17%	-5.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSEW	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.13%	8.89%	+3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	8.89%	+8.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.19%	8.89%	+10.30%

GSEW vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSEW vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	1.41%	1.52%	1.46%	1.64%	1.74%	1.34%	1.53%	1.66%	1.56%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSEW and GRW in my portfolio?

GSEW and GRW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GSEW or GRW?

On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSEW or GRW?

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSEW or GRW?

GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between GSEW and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.75% for GRW.