GSEW vs. BCI
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI).
GSEW and BCI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSEW is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. BCI is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Performance
GSEW vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSEW vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.15% | 11.97% | 16.89% | 17.80% | -17.54% | 25.43% | 16.28% | 31.04% | -8.11% | 7.67% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 23.30% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -8.79% | 15.09% | 26.18% | -2.77% | 7.06% | -11.21% | 3.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 23.30% return.
GSEW
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 13.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- —
BCI
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 8.27%
- YTD
- 23.30%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSEW vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GSEW vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
GSEW
BCI
GSEW vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSEW | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 1.80 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 2.39 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 3.29 | -2.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | 9.08 | -4.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSEW | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 1.80 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.79 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.47 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEW and BCI is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GSEW vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than BCI's 13.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.37% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
Drawdowns
GSEW vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and BCI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEW | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -32.69% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.71% | -9.28% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -26.50% | +0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.14% | -0.86% | -4.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -12.19% | +6.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 3.37% | -0.59% |
Volatility
GSEW vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 4.87%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSEW | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 7.18% | -2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 13.62% | -4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.69% | 17.10% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 16.63% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 15.57% | +3.75% |