PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSC vs. GSEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSC vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSC achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than GSEW's 9.52% return.


GSC

1D
-0.49%
1M
4.25%
YTD
15.37%
6M
14.45%
1Y
27.08%
3Y*
26.13%
5Y*
21.00%
10Y*
10.81%

GSEW

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.19%
YTD
9.52%
6M
9.82%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSC vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
15.37%6.29%13.79%33.52%28.40%58.09%-33.08%29.69%-19.52%12.54%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
9.52%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between GSC and GSEW is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2017

0.28

Over the past year, GSC and GSEW have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GSC vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSC
GSEW

Technology

23.6%
20.9%

Industrials

17.5%
15.6%

Financial Services

16.5%
14.3%

Healthcare

12.4%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
9.1%

Basic Materials

6.4%
4.6%

Energy

4.2%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
5.7%

Utilities

3.1%
5.8%

Real Estate

2.6%
4.0%

Communication Services

0.9%
3.5%

Technology

GSC
23.6%
GSEW
20.9%

Industrials

GSC
17.5%
GSEW
15.6%

Financial Services

GSC
16.5%
GSEW
14.3%

Healthcare

GSC
12.4%
GSEW
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GSC
8.8%
GSEW
9.1%

Basic Materials

GSC
6.4%
GSEW
4.6%

Energy

GSC
4.2%
GSEW
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

GSC
3.8%
GSEW
5.7%

Utilities

GSC
3.1%
GSEW
5.8%

Real Estate

GSC
2.6%
GSEW
4.0%

Communication Services

GSC
0.9%
GSEW
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSC vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSC
GSC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSC Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSC vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSCGSEWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

1.56

-1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.80

2.24

+1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.27

+0.72

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

2.45

-1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.61

9.35

-7.74

GSC vs. GSEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the GSEW Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSC and GSEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSCGSEWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

1.56

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.51

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.61

-0.61

Drawdowns

GSC vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSC drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than GSEW's maximum drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSC and GSEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCGSEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-38.65%

-49.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.25%

-7.72%

-50.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.25%

-18.18%

-40.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.25%

-25.74%

-32.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.48%

-0.66%

-30.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.28%

-5.89%

-53.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.91%

2.02%

+14.89%

Volatility

GSC vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) at 2.76%. This indicates that GSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSCGSEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

2.76%

+3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

203.12%

9.05%

+194.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

403.80%

12.12%

+391.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

218.92%

16.91%

+202.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

160.38%

19.20%

+141.18%

GSC vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSC vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison

GSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than GSEW's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
0.17%0.16%0.66%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.42%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSC and GSEW have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSC has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to GSEW (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSC dropped -88.63% vs GSEW's -38.65%.

On 5-year performance, GSC leads with 21.00% vs 8.63% for GSEW. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSC has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 8.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSC.

GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.17% for GSC.

GSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while GSEW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GSC and 0.09% for GSEW.

GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSC and GSEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer