GSC vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
GSC and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSC is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Oct 3, 2023. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.
Performance
GSC vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSC vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSC Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 0.60% | 6.29% | 13.79% | 33.52% | 28.40% | 58.09% | -33.08% | 29.69% | -19.52% | 2.90% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.93% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSC achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GSC has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 11.14%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.76% annualized return.
GSC
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 17.46%
- 3Y*
- 20.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.14%
IWM
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSC vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSC vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
GSC
IWM
GSC vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSC | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.04 | 1.11 | -1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.79 | 1.66 | +2.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.92 | 1.21 | +0.71 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 1.82 | -1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | 6.76 | -5.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSC | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | 1.11 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.15 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 0.43 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.34 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSC and IWM is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GSC vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
GSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than IWM's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSC Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 0.19% | 0.16% | 0.66% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.02% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
GSC vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSC drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSC and IWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSC | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.63% | -59.05% | -29.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.25% | -13.74% | -44.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.25% | -31.91% | -26.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.06% | -41.13% | -24.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.25% | -7.91% | -32.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.52% | -10.83% | -48.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.28% | 3.70% | +13.58% |
Volatility
GSC vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 7.47%. This indicates that GSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSC | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | 7.47% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 313.02% | 14.47% | +298.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 410.88% | 23.18% | +387.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.28% | 22.55% | +196.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 160.40% | 22.99% | +137.41% |