GSBFX vs. FMUAX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GSBFX (Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund) and FMUAX (Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, GSBFX returned 6.86%/yr vs 6.06%/yr for FMUAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSBFX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FMUAX.

Performance

GSBFX vs. FMUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSBFX having a 6.46% return and FMUAX slightly higher at 6.76%. Over the past 10 years, GSBFX has outperformed FMUAX with an annualized return of 6.86%, while FMUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.06% annualized return.

GSBFX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.48%
• 6M: 5.08%
• YTD: 6.46%
• 1Y: 12.44%
• 3Y*: 10.46%
• 5Y*: 5.72%
• 10Y*: 6.86%

FMUAX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.66%
• 6M: 5.56%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 1Y: 15.21%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 6.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSBFX vs. FMUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	6.46%	10.42%	9.32%	9.64%	-9.53%	10.50%	9.53%	19.38%	-4.92%	7.94%
FMUAX Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund	6.76%	9.00%	8.70%	9.81%	-10.68%	10.32%	8.48%	15.16%	-5.24%	11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GSBFX and FMUAX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2003	0.86

The correlation between GSBFX and FMUAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GSBFX vs. FMUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSBFX

GSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 84
GSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
GSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FMUAX

FMUAX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FMUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FMUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FMUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FMUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FMUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSBFX vs. FMUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSBFX	FMUAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	3.00	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	4.63	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.58	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	3.77	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.61	18.23	-5.63

GSBFX vs. FMUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FMUAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSBFX and FMUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSBFX vs. FMUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSBFX drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than FMUAX's maximum drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBFX and FMUAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSBFX	FMUAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.04%	-22.43%	-14.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.44%	-4.94%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.14%	-10.18%	+2.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.94%	-15.93%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.42%	-21.46%	-1.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.06%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-2.74%	-1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	0.95%	+0.07%

Volatility

GSBFX vs. FMUAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) is 1.20%, while Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that GSBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSBFX	FMUAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	1.57%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.66%	4.86%	-0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.68%	6.23%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.44%	7.21%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.95%	8.13%	-0.18%

GSBFX vs. FMUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSBFX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FMUAX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSBFX vs. FMUAX - Dividend Comparison

GSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than FMUAX's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMUAX Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund	1.42%	1.23%	2.01%	2.53%	2.25%	4.56%	2.12%	4.00%	7.98%	2.17%	2.36%	2.80%
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	5.05%	4.39%	5.12%	3.41%	4.10%	6.66%	3.05%	3.52%	3.98%	3.52%	3.78%	3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSBFX and FMUAX in my portfolio?

GSBFX and FMUAX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSBFX or FMUAX?

FMUAX has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to GSBFX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSBFX dropped -37.04% vs FMUAX's -22.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.