PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUAX vs. FCSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUAX vs. FCSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FMUAX having a 5.87% return and FCSRX slightly higher at 6.09%. Over the past 10 years, FMUAX has outperformed FCSRX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while FCSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.47% annualized return.


FMUAX

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.89%
YTD
5.87%
6M
5.67%
1Y
15.81%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
6.19%

FCSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
6.09%
6M
5.84%
1Y
11.64%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*
4.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMUAX vs. FCSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
5.87%9.00%8.70%9.81%-10.68%10.32%8.48%15.16%-5.24%11.09%
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
6.09%9.27%4.75%3.60%-4.26%14.68%2.60%9.54%-5.03%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FMUAX and FCSRX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between FMUAX and FCSRX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUAX vs. FCSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUAX
FMUAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FMUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FCSRX
FCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMUAX vs. FCSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMUAXFCSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.46

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

4.14

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.57

16.77

+2.80

FMUAX vs. FCSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is higher than the FCSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUAX and FCSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMUAX vs. FCSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUAX drawdown since its inception was -22.43%, smaller than the maximum FCSRX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUAX and FCSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUAXFCSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.43%

-33.91%

+11.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.94%

-2.76%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.18%

-5.85%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.93%

-13.22%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.46%

-20.02%

-1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-2.76%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-5.09%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.68%

+0.28%

Volatility

FMUAX vs. FCSRX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) at 1.39%. This indicates that FMUAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUAXFCSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

1.39%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.04%

3.71%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.24%

4.76%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.21%

6.89%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.13%

6.71%

+1.42%

FMUAX vs. FCSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSRX's 1.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUAX vs. FCSRX - Dividend Comparison

FMUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than FCSRX's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
3.34%3.74%3.86%4.35%6.51%4.53%1.32%2.20%8.51%1.58%1.34%0.66%
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
1.25%1.23%2.01%2.53%2.25%4.56%2.12%4.00%7.98%2.17%2.36%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMUAX and FCSRX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMUAX has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to FCSRX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUAX dropped -22.43% vs FCSRX's -33.91%.

FMUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUAX and FCSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer