PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUAX vs. QAMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUAX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUAX achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly higher than QAMNX's -0.85% return.


FMUAX

1D
-0.60%
1M
1.28%
YTD
5.24%
6M
4.84%
1Y
14.57%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
6.13%

QAMNX

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
-1.05%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMUAX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
5.24%9.00%8.70%9.81%-10.68%3.20%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
-0.85%10.00%17.33%4.71%9.19%12.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FMUAX and QAMNX is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021

0.02

The correlation between FMUAX and QAMNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUAX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUAX
FMUAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FMUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

QAMNX
QAMNX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
QAMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QAMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMUAX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMUAXQAMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.09

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

0.72

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.20

1.61

+16.59

FMUAX vs. QAMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the QAMNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUAX and QAMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMUAX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUAX drawdown since its inception was -22.43%, which is greater than QAMNX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUAX and QAMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUAXQAMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.43%

-17.97%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.94%

-4.16%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.18%

-4.16%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-2.85%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-5.12%

+2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.87%

-0.91%

Volatility

FMUAX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) have volatilities of 2.31% and 2.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUAXQAMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

2.29%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.08%

5.26%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.27%

6.72%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.21%

13.80%

-6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.13%

13.80%

-5.67%

FMUAX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUAX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison

FMUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than QAMNX's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
1.26%1.23%2.01%2.53%2.25%4.56%2.12%4.00%7.98%2.17%2.36%2.80%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
1.54%1.53%1.85%5.89%11.74%20.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMUAX and QAMNX have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMUAX has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to QAMNX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUAX dropped -22.43% vs QAMNX's -17.97%.

FMUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUAX and QAMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer